Sunday, October 31, 2010

Certainity in Novels

    In this day and age a large amount of movies made are based off of popular novels. Classics like Doctor Zhavago, Jaws, The Godfather, Frankenstein and Gone with the Wind were all adapted to the screen after a book. Even some of the most popular movie and tv shows today were not originally planned for screen (ex: Twilight, Vampire Diaries, Harry Potter, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, etc.), yet it is commonly known that the book is often better than the movie. Aside from films in which events and plot lines are completely changed, this mostly has to do with the narration.
    Narration in a movie does not impress the majority of the public anymore. For the most part the constant voice-overs annoy the audience, however this is the main method of description in a book. While some may claim this is only true in first person narration, it is certainly present in stories told in third person narration too. In a book we can understand that the chair is green because the statement is plainly written while in a movie the image relies much more on perspective. Even something as simple as color can be interpreted in different ways, depending on the shades. A thought or feeling, like portraying that the main character is thinking about the loss of a companion, is much more difficult to express without dialogue in a film. To compensate for these difficiencies in films, many lines and scenes must be tweaked to keep the same meaning, causing changes in the script to be made when adapting from a written source.
    The narration in a book is even very different in life because of this true picture the descriptions and feelings give us. In a sense, novels provide much more of a black and white world than real life. Due to the lack of a visual when we read, the author must give a solid description of places, people, and feelings. Though there surely is flexibility in these narratives, there is considerably more than in actual life when it is common for one person to be described completely differently from one person to the other. This idea that we are seeing through someone else's prospective is in the back of our minds as we read, but for the most part what is written is accepted (even more so in third person narratives than first person). It is an intriguing concept to grasp when delving into a new book.
    The ability to give the reader a solid picture in a novel makes it possible for the point of the piece to be understood. Without creating a more certain understanding for the feelings and circumstances of the characters the meaning of a written piece would lose its specific meaning. Movies, therefore, must also construct a central idea and show one side of the story to make a statement, but is still more of a gray picture because the scenes are not constructed as certainly through written words. Though we can be moved by books and relate to the feelings illustrated within them, life does lack the element to make such direct points.

1 comment:

  1. Interesting topic. I've always wondered why movies are generally horrible in comparison to their written companions (with very few exceptions) and I think you've hit the nail right on the head. Everything is much more certain in a book; you rely on the narrator (third or first person) to tell you definitively what is what. You don't have that in a movie and certain things will invariably be unclear. In the worst movie adaptations, the most important aspects of the book will lack certainty and/or feeling in their silver screen portrayal. Ultimately, the fault lies in the fact that the mediums border on incompatability because their very natures contradict one another. Great post and very, very enlightening.

    ReplyDelete